Training Accounts Pokemon Deluge

The reversal of the reversal of theology ...

On left this week (1) read an interesting interview (The reversal of theology, in fact) to the theologian Vito Mancuso, which contrasts with the negative side effect of guilt and dogmatic Christianity of the Church ...

It's an interview following the presentation, the publisher Fazi, a book by Matthew Fox on "In the beginning was the joy " that Mancuso, the site of the house Publisher Campo dei Fiori, with the words " is finally to understand that genuine portal of entry to Christianity is not evil, but it's good, is not the curse, but it is a blessing, not the pain, but joy. The way cosmocentric illustrated with enthusiasm by Fox in this masterpiece is the only possibility for Christianity to return really affect the actual life of 'humanity .

But can you really conceive, as he says, a Christian based the original good rather than on the original crime? E 'a likely scenario or a subtle trick to find a summary (all political) among Catholics, lay, agnostics and former communists always so quick to exalt Jesus "proletarian" Origins of the Christ 'recent' to counteract the cold of the faith of the Vatican hierarchy management? " There are books that bring fear to those who hold power ..." is the beginning of an article, also signed by Vito Mancuso, who has dedicated the book of the former Republic Dominican friar American (2) .

Claiming an original human goodness inside the Christian concept would undermine the most critical when Christianity has always been subject, turning it into a container of good feelings, social justice and free of any universalist utopias concrete theory on humans. It was so good because God wanted.

Some years ago Cardinal Martini (also an admirer of Vito Mancuso) in response to a reader in the pages of Corriere (3) textual affirmation that the Church might even accept Darwin's theory of evolution, as long as they except for two basic concepts: the first creation as a work of God and the dogma of original sin. The sin of Adam (Eva primarily ) can not be touched.

Good. So where's the catch? You can probably pass it to advance the hypothesis that Augustine (and his famous conflict with Pelagius on sinfulness of children who die without baptism) the responsibility of the 'original sin', with the exception of the first three centuries of Christianity abundant, making it a mythical golden age, free of guilt and penance necessary.

But we forget so maybe Saul, Roman said Paul, who after being struck on the road to Damascus, revived the myth of the fall of Adam, recovering from the book of Genesis that had not aroused the slightest interest in Jewish literature of the thousand years earlier.

" is St. Paul who brought the subject out of its lethargy Adamic (...) The figure of Adam (...) was personified on the model of the Christ which is by contrast "says Paul Ricoeur in finitude and guilt.

The 'serving' the fall of the first man to support the salvation given by the Messiah and bustle of his passion / crucifixion / death / resurrection. In a mirror to the first man of sin so they could oppose the last man, the redeemer.

" Then as the fault of one man has affected all people the conviction, so also for the work of Justice to one pours upon all men ... justification "Romans 5-12.

If there was, prior to a fault, what for God himself would incarnate in a man to die and rise again? Thomas, the embodiment is for redemption. Without sin, there would have been ... Obviously. To do that otherwise?

But " The statement that, until the advent of Jesus, mankind was under the dominion of sin, the resulting doctrine of original sin, the idea of \u200b\u200bredemption through Jesus as the only way of liberation from sin, completely reverse the structures discourse of the original Hebrew ... "Ariel Toaff, Jesus and incomprehensibility of the Christian message .

So is the guilt that distinguished the 'new' religion from Judaism and the blame had to be original or the 'new' religion would make no sense. Hence the accusation of being a Christian culture amartiocentrica, that is centered on guilt, not about salvation, but as you are going to propose a fundamental deception historically very profitable.

Now Mancuso then falls into a situation of having to reject not Augustine, but Paul of Tarsus (emblem of the new left as we know), that the Christianity of the Great Church, the oldest, or at least as old as the Judeo-Christianity that defeated, pushing him out of history.

And here we are perhaps at the core of the "new" theological project, the big news: who will revive the Judeo-Christianity as opposed to Pauline Christianity?
to recognize Jesus as the Messiah, finance the Son of God made man, but not the truth of original sin? Mancuso says, " Jesus, like any good jew, he was not aware of a original sin." That is a sinful original human being.

True, there is no trace in the phrases attributed to Jesus in the Gospels of conceptualizations outside the complex and Jewish thought of the time and the Fox in an interview in Corriere (4 ) says " ... I do not deny original sin. I contend what we mean by this. The word 'sin' is very problematic and will not appear anywhere in the Jewish consciousness (ie Jesus) "arguing that, in fact, infant baptism was only a ritual function of acceptance in the community, not a fault of purification prenatal, unlike the baptism of adults who actually have this feature of 'cleaning up' from their sins.

Yet many scholars of Judaism's Second Temple say a close ideological proximity between the first el'essenismo Christianity, that is with a minority, but not insignificant, the last two centuries of Jewish apocalyptic a. C.

And in the caves of Qumran, the site of a current (maybe) dell'essenismo schismatic, was found a manuscript where it says " What creature of clay can make miracles? Since the uterus is in sin and into old age guilty in iniquity ". (5) Where the Hebrew word used, awon (sin) has a meaning close to 'spot' indelible" the awon is (...) a stain that sticks man since the conception: it is therefore part of his nature "(6).

The man is so far from the uterus in sin? It will not be a reference to the guilt of Adam (in fact it is not), but it clearly speaks of an innate to human sinfulness. And the word 'sin' does exist. The amartiocentrismo then existed. Even thought the Essenes (or so) based his conceptualization of human nature on fault.

Jews who rejected the original sin of orthodoxy were those of the Temple, the Sadducees, Pharisees, which then the 'Rabbinic Judaism and those who refused in the wake of Ezekiel the transmissibility of guilt: " He who has sinned and no one else has to die, and the son not bear the iniquity of the father nor the father the iniquity of the son. The righteous shall be credited with his righteousness and evil his wickedness "(Ezekiel 18, 20).

also a jew today categorically rejects the idea of \u200b\u200boriginal sin, attributing it to Christianity. But not those two thousand years ago the Jews were closer to the current apocalyptic-messianic. So you can imagine, even the Judeo-Christians, though probably the close connection between Adam and Jesus and mirror did not.

So what religion talks Vito Mancuso (and before him, Matthew Fox) when he says well-known as a primary source? Of a new religion? Or the intent is only to give a veneer of words to the old old story of 'good early Christianity'? Or is there still more? New theory which wants to propose to the battered troops of the Italian left ? The mystique of the child, the wonder of being alive, as he says in left?

Today there is no longer wander in darkness in search of a more or less spiritualistic explanation of the origin of humans is not as pure materiality ...

Today it is claimed, to clear that the first human activity is "the ability to imagine", coming from a specific biological process, from physiology of birth, another provision that mystical " to feel the immense load of good that surrounds us and wonder . Just
study Massimo Fagioli.

This is not easy, but when did the ideas were easy?

March 2011

this blog: cf. also "Myth and Ideology: the original sin"

Notes

1) No 10, March 11, 2011
2) La Repubblica, February 17, 2011
3) Corriere della Sera, August 30, 2009
4) Corriere della Sera, February 17, 2011
5) Hymns of Qumran, 1QH - Col. XII (= IV), 5-40, Prayer anguish and trust in God.
6) Paolo Sacchi, the Old Testament Apocrypha .

Bibliography

M. Beans, Death Instinct and knowledge
M. Beans, The puppet and the puppet
M. Beans, Theory of the birth and castration human
M. Beans, children, women and the transformation of man
M. Beans, History of a search. Lectures 2002
M. Beans, Das Unbewusste. Lectures 2003
M. Beans, the new thinking. Lectures 2004
M. Beans, One Life irrational. Lectures 2006
M. Beans, Fantasy disappearance. Lectures 2007
M. Beans, Left 2006
M. Beans, Left 2007

also www.lasinodoroedizioni.it

Training Accounts Pokemon Deluge

The reversal of the reversal of theology ...

On left this week (1) read an interesting interview (The reversal of theology, in fact) to the theologian Vito Mancuso, which contrasts with the negative side effect of guilt and dogmatic Christianity of the Church ...

It's an interview following the presentation, the publisher Fazi, a book by Matthew Fox on "In the beginning was the joy " that Mancuso, the site of the house Publisher Campo dei Fiori, with the words " is finally to understand that genuine portal of entry to Christianity is not evil, but it's good, is not the curse, but it is a blessing, not the pain, but joy. The way cosmocentric illustrated with enthusiasm by Fox in this masterpiece is the only possibility for Christianity to return really affect the actual life of 'humanity .

But can you really conceive, as he says, a Christian based the original good rather than on the original crime? E 'a likely scenario or a subtle trick to find a summary (all political) among Catholics, lay, agnostics and former communists always so quick to exalt Jesus "proletarian" Origins of the Christ 'recent' to counteract the cold of the faith of the Vatican hierarchy management? " There are books that bring fear to those who hold power ..." is the beginning of an article, also signed by Vito Mancuso, who has dedicated the book of the former Republic Dominican friar American (2) .

Claiming an original human goodness inside the Christian concept would undermine the most critical when Christianity has always been subject, turning it into a container of good feelings, social justice and free of any universalist utopias concrete theory on humans. It was so good because God wanted.

Some years ago Cardinal Martini (also an admirer of Vito Mancuso) in response to a reader in the pages of Corriere (3) textual affirmation that the Church might even accept Darwin's theory of evolution, as long as they except for two basic concepts: the first creation as a work of God and the dogma of original sin. The sin of Adam (Eva primarily ) can not be touched.

Good. So where's the catch? You can probably pass it to advance the hypothesis that Augustine (and his famous conflict with Pelagius on sinfulness of children who die without baptism) the responsibility of the 'original sin', with the exception of the first three centuries of Christianity abundant, making it a mythical golden age, free of guilt and penance necessary.

But we forget so maybe Saul, Roman said Paul, who after being struck on the road to Damascus, revived the myth of the fall of Adam, recovering from the book of Genesis that had not aroused the slightest interest in Jewish literature of the thousand years earlier.

" is St. Paul who brought the subject out of its lethargy Adamic (...) The figure of Adam (...) was personified on the model of the Christ which is by contrast "says Paul Ricoeur in finitude and guilt.

The 'serving' the fall of the first man to support the salvation given by the Messiah and bustle of his passion / crucifixion / death / resurrection. In a mirror to the first man of sin so they could oppose the last man, the redeemer.

" Then as the fault of one man has affected all people the conviction, so also for the work of Justice to one pours upon all men ... justification "Romans 5-12.

If there was, prior to a fault, what for God himself would incarnate in a man to die and rise again? Thomas, the embodiment is for redemption. Without sin, there would have been ... Obviously. To do that otherwise?

But " The statement that, until the advent of Jesus, mankind was under the dominion of sin, the resulting doctrine of original sin, the idea of \u200b\u200bredemption through Jesus as the only way of liberation from sin, completely reverse the structures discourse of the original Hebrew ... "Ariel Toaff, Jesus and incomprehensibility of the Christian message .

So is the guilt that distinguished the 'new' religion from Judaism and the blame had to be original or the 'new' religion would make no sense. Hence the accusation of being a Christian culture amartiocentrica, that is centered on guilt, not about salvation, but as you are going to propose a fundamental deception historically very profitable.

Now Mancuso then falls into a situation of having to reject not Augustine, but Paul of Tarsus (emblem of the new left as we know), that the Christianity of the Great Church, the oldest, or at least as old as the Judeo-Christianity that defeated, pushing him out of history.

And here we are perhaps at the core of the "new" theological project, the big news: who will revive the Judeo-Christianity as opposed to Pauline Christianity?
to recognize Jesus as the Messiah, finance the Son of God made man, but not the truth of original sin? Mancuso says, " Jesus, like any good jew, he was not aware of a original sin." That is a sinful original human being.

True, there is no trace in the phrases attributed to Jesus in the Gospels of conceptualizations outside the complex and Jewish thought of the time and the Fox in an interview in Corriere (4 ) says " ... I do not deny original sin. I contend what we mean by this. The word 'sin' is very problematic and will not appear anywhere in the Jewish consciousness (ie Jesus) "arguing that, in fact, infant baptism was only a ritual function of acceptance in the community, not a fault of purification prenatal, unlike the baptism of adults who actually have this feature of 'cleaning up' from their sins.

Yet many scholars of Judaism's Second Temple say a close ideological proximity between the first el'essenismo Christianity, that is with a minority, but not insignificant, the last two centuries of Jewish apocalyptic a. C.

And in the caves of Qumran, the site of a current (maybe) dell'essenismo schismatic, was found a manuscript where it says " What creature of clay can make miracles? Since the uterus is in sin and into old age guilty in iniquity ". (5) Where the Hebrew word used, awon (sin) has a meaning close to 'spot' indelible" the awon is (...) a stain that sticks man since the conception: it is therefore part of his nature "(6).

The man is so far from the uterus in sin? It will not be a reference to the guilt of Adam (in fact it is not), but it clearly speaks of an innate to human sinfulness. And the word 'sin' does exist. The amartiocentrismo then existed. Even thought the Essenes (or so) based his conceptualization of human nature on fault.

Jews who rejected the original sin of orthodoxy were those of the Temple, the Sadducees, Pharisees, which then the 'Rabbinic Judaism and those who refused in the wake of Ezekiel the transmissibility of guilt: " He who has sinned and no one else has to die, and the son not bear the iniquity of the father nor the father the iniquity of the son. The righteous shall be credited with his righteousness and evil his wickedness "(Ezekiel 18, 20).

also a jew today categorically rejects the idea of \u200b\u200boriginal sin, attributing it to Christianity. But not those two thousand years ago the Jews were closer to the current apocalyptic-messianic. So you can imagine, even the Judeo-Christians, though probably the close connection between Adam and Jesus and mirror did not.

So what religion talks Vito Mancuso (and before him, Matthew Fox) when he says well-known as a primary source? Of a new religion? Or the intent is only to give a veneer of words to the old old story of 'good early Christianity'? Or is there still more? New theory which wants to propose to the battered troops of the Italian left ? The mystique of the child, the wonder of being alive, as he says in left?

Today there is no longer wander in darkness in search of a more or less spiritualistic explanation of the origin of humans is not as pure materiality ...

Today it is claimed, to clear that the first human activity is "the ability to imagine", coming from a specific biological process, from physiology of birth, another provision that mystical " to feel the immense load of good that surrounds us and wonder . Just
study Massimo Fagioli.

This is not easy, but when did the ideas were easy?

March 2011

this blog: cf. also "Myth and Ideology: the original sin"

Notes

1) No 10, March 11, 2011
2) La Repubblica, February 17, 2011
3) Corriere della Sera, August 30, 2009
4) Corriere della Sera, February 17, 2011
5) Hymns of Qumran, 1QH - Col. XII (= IV), 5-40, Prayer anguish and trust in God.
6) Paolo Sacchi, the Old Testament Apocrypha .

Bibliography

M. Beans, Death Instinct and knowledge
M. Beans, The puppet and the puppet
M. Beans, Theory of the birth and castration human
M. Beans, children, women and the transformation of man
M. Beans, History of a search. Lectures 2002
M. Beans, Das Unbewusste. Lectures 2003
M. Beans, the new thinking. Lectures 2004
M. Beans, One Life irrational. Lectures 2006
M. Beans, Fantasy disappearance. Lectures 2007
M. Beans, Left 2006
M. Beans, Left 2007

also www.lasinodoroedizioni.it

Catchy Birthday Title For Facebook Event

ITALY


"We are a country without memory. That is to say, without history. Italy removes his recent past, the television ether lost in oblivion, it takes only memories, fragments that may make them convenient for its contortions, for his conversion.

But Italy is a country circular gattopardesco, where everything changes to remain as is. In which everything flows really not to go. If Italy had care of his history, his memory, it would find that the schemes are not born from nothing, are the result of poisons ancient metastasis invincible, we learn that special in this country live the high life, but with the ragged ass, that his vices are cyclical, recurring embodied by men with different the cynicism, the same disregard for ethics, with the same allergy to the coherence, in a moral tension. "

Pier Paolo Pasolini, Scritti pirates, 1975

Catchy Birthday Title For Facebook Event

ITALY


"We are a country without memory. That is to say, without history. Italy removes his recent past, the television ether lost in oblivion, it takes only memories, fragments that may make them convenient for its contortions, for his conversion.

But Italy is a country circular gattopardesco, where everything changes to remain as is. In which everything flows really not to go. If Italy had care of his history, his memory, it would find that the schemes are not born from nothing, are the result of poisons ancient metastasis invincible, we learn that special in this country live the high life, but with the ragged ass, that his vices are cyclical, recurring embodied by men with different the cynicism, the same disregard for ethics, with the same allergy to the coherence, in a moral tension. "

Pier Paolo Pasolini, Scritti pirates, 1975

Sentinel Pile Is Bigger

ACCIDENT AND LIABILITY 'CAPE

ACCIDENT AND LIABILITY 'HEAD YARD

The foreman is certainly appropriate person to identify the correct application of safety rules, or at least to those of common prudence, for the prevention of accidents in which employees may be involved or third persons outside the work. Neither has any relief that could be guaranteed more security for workers, as if more are the holders of the position of warranty or obligation to prevent the event, each is addressed in full the obligation of protection imposed by law until not end the relationship that has legitimized the establishment of that position to guarantee, for which the failure application of a caution accident prevention is attributable to each of the holders of that position.
Adapted from Environment & Sicurezza.IlSole24Ore "n 4, 8 March 2011

Sentinel Pile Is Bigger

ACCIDENT AND LIABILITY 'CAPE

ACCIDENT AND LIABILITY 'HEAD YARD

The foreman is certainly appropriate person to identify the correct application of safety rules, or at least to those of common prudence, for the prevention of accidents in which employees may be involved or third persons outside the work. Neither has any relief that could be guaranteed more security for workers, as if more are the holders of the position of warranty or obligation to prevent the event, each is addressed in full the obligation of protection imposed by law until not end the relationship that has legitimized the establishment of that position to guarantee, for which the failure application of a caution accident prevention is attributable to each of the holders of that position.
Adapted from Environment & Sicurezza.IlSole24Ore "n 4, 8 March 2011

Trailersgratisbaitbus

Suttree

Caro nomic hours without time now in the dusty streets of the city when they lie dark and steaming in the wake of autoinnaffiatrici and now that the drunk and the homeless are stuck in the shelter of the walls in the streets or in vacant lots and skinny cats and hunched forward in these dismal surroundings, now in the corridors and cobbled pavements of soot blacks where the shadow of the wire light draws gothic harps on the doors of the basement will not walk a soul except you.

Cormac McCarthy, Suttree

Trailersgratisbaitbus

Suttree

Caro nomic hours without time now in the dusty streets of the city when they lie dark and steaming in the wake of autoinnaffiatrici and now that the drunk and the homeless are stuck in the shelter of the walls in the streets or in vacant lots and skinny cats and hunched forward in these dismal surroundings, now in the corridors and cobbled pavements of soot blacks where the shadow of the wire light draws gothic harps on the doors of the basement will not walk a soul except you.

Cormac McCarthy, Suttree

List Cheats On Gpsphone

A MODEST PROPOSAL: REMOVE THE MIDDLE SCHOOL AND TELEVISION

The "modest proposal" by Pier Paolo Pasolini, provocative yes, but so painfully desirable. The swift humor in the service of anthropological mutation of the Italians passed, n el just over half a century, people-to-earth.

Needless to say, only enough, you need to step back and make ten forward, with structured analysis can, quietly, in a collection and air terribly serious break in the deafening noise of the poor language of the banal and repetitive, the vacuous, dell'insensato.

Corriere della Sera , October 18, 1975

Abolish the TV and the school

of Pier Paolo Pasolini

The various cases of crime that the apocalyptically fill the newspapers and our consciousness quite terrified, are not cases : are, of course, extreme cases of a criminal way of being popular and profound mass.
fact the criminals are not only the neo-fascists. Recently an incident (the killing of a girl in the Circeo) has suddenly lightened all consciousness and did pull a big sigh of relief because the perpetrators of the massacre were just fascists of Parioli. So there was to be welcomed for two reasons: 1) to confirm that they are only and always to blame for all fascists, 2) confirmation of the fact that the blame is always only the privileged bourgeois and corrupt. The joy of being confirmed in this ancient populist sentiment - and the moral strength of the annexed configuration - not only has exploded in the Communist newspaper, but in all the press (which, after June 15 has a great fear of being less than just the Communists ). In fact, the bourgeois press was literally happy to blame the criminals of Parioli, because blaming so dramatically, favored them (only the middle-class dramas have real value and interest) and at the same time he could bask in the old idea that the crimes lumpen proletariat, and it is useless to deal with that much more, since it is established that a priori and lumpen proletariat are not criminals.
I think therefore, that the massacre of the Circeo in Italy has stirred up the usual offensive wave of journalistic stupidity. In fact, I repeat, the criminals are not only the neo-fascists, but they are also the same way and with the same consciousness, the proletariat or underclass, who may have voted Communist June 15. Think of the murder of the brothers of Torpignattara Carlino, or aggression of Cinecittà (a boy brutally beaten and locked in the trunk of the car and the girl raped and tortured for seven young of the suburbs of Rome). These criminals "popular" - And for now I am referring, precisely documented, only brothers Carlino - enjoyed the exact same conditional release that the criminals of Parioli, the same impunity that is enjoyed. E 'therefore absurd to accuse the judges who sent out "on bail" if you do not accuse the neo-fascists at the same time and with the same firmness that the courts have sent out "on bail" Carlino brothers (and thousands more of young offenders in the Roman suburbs).

The reality is this: the extreme cases of crime are derived from an environment criminaloide mass. It takes thousands of cases like the little party of Circeo sadistic or brutal aggression for reasons traffic for the realization of cases like those of Parioli or sadistic sadistic Torpingnattara. As for me, I say this for some years that the universe is popular Roman world "odious." I say this with the scandal of right-thinking people, and especially with the scandal of the conformists who do not believe they are. And I also set out the reasons (loss of the young people of their moral values, that is, the particularistic culture, with its patterns of behavior, etc.). And by the way, then, of a universe such as the popular Roman criminaloide must say that there are valid mitigating the usual populist is necessary to have the same rigid puritanical and punitive that we are used to show off against demonstrations criminaloide the extremely bourgeois neo-fascist. In fact, the young Roman lumpen proletariat and petty bourgeois universe is now totally belong: the middle-class model has been successfully imposed their own, once and for all. And their concrete models are the very small middle class idiots and fierce that they, the good times, they despised so much and so wittily as ridiculous and repugnant void. No wonder the girl torturers underclass of Cinecittà, using her as a "thing" by saying, "Take heed that you do what they did to Rosa Lopez." My experience of private, everyday, existential - which opposed the offensive once more abstraction and approximation of journalists and politicians who do not live these things - tells me that there's no real difference in the attitude towards the real and the resulting behavior between the bourgeois Parioli and the underclass of the suburbs. The same enigmatic smile, and livid face shows their moral imponderables (their being suspended between the loss of old values \u200b\u200band the failure to acquire new ones: the total lack of any opinion on his "operation").
Another thing that experience teaches me is that this is a phenomenon totally Italian. It is part of conformism, however outdated, information on Italian comfort themselves with the fact that in other countries have problems of crime: it exists, is true, but arises in a world where the bourgeois institutions remain solid and efficient, and therefore continue to offer in return.
What is it that has transformed the lumpen proletariat and Italian, in substance, petty bourgeois, devoured, most importantly, economic anxiety to be? What is it that has transformed the "masses" of young people in the "masses" of criminaloidi? I've said and repeated dozens of times by now: a "second" industrial revolution in Italy is actually the "first": the cynical consumerism that has destroyed a "real" world, making it a total unreality, where c ' possible choice is between good and evil. Hence the ambiguity that characterizes the criminals and their ferocity, produced by the absolute lack of any traditional inner conflict. There was in their choice between good and evil, but nevertheless there was a choice: the choice dell'impietrimento, the lack of any compassion.

He complains in Italy the lack of a modern police effectiveness against crime. That is, I mostly complain is the lack of an informed conscience of all this, and survival of progressive rhetoric that has nothing to do with reality. Progressives must now be in another world, invent a new way to be free, especially in judging, in fact, he has chosen the end of piety. Admittedly once and for all the failure of tolerance. That was, of course, a false tolerance, and was one of the most important causes degeneration of the masses of young people. Must be short acting, judging, and therefore not a priori (a priori progressive valid until a decade ago).
What are my two modest proposals to tackle crime? There are two proposals swiftiane, as their definition do not care the least humorous to hide.
1) immediately abolish the compulsory school .
2) Abolish immediately television. As teachers and employees of the television can not be eaten, as suggested by Swift, but simply can be put in layoffs.
The compulsory school is a school of initiation into life as a lower middle class: you can teach things useless, silly, false, moralistic, even in the best case (ie when calls to apply the false flattery of democracy ' self-management, decentralization, etc..: a whole mess). In addition, a concept is dynamic only if it includes the expansion and deepening: learning a little 'history makes sense only if it projects into the future the possibility of a real historical culture. Otherwise, the concepts Marche region death, having no future, and thus their function is merely to create, together with a small middle class instead of a proletarian slave or free of an underclass (ie belonging to another culture , which lets you understand where virgin new real things, while it is clear that those who took the compulsory schooling is a prisoner of its lowest circle of knowledge, and be offended in front of each new). A fifth grade good enough today in Italy to a worker and his son. An illusion of progress is that the degradation is a criminal, because it makes: first, presumptuous (because of those two miserable things learned) and second (and often simultaneously), painfully frustrated, because those two things he has learned nothing that earned him the consciousness of his own ignorance. Of course to get to the fifth to eighth class instead, or better, get to the fifteenth class, it would be for me as for everyone, the optimum, I suppose. But today in Italy since compulsory schooling is exactly as I described (and I literally fear the idea that there is added a "sex education", so maybe it means the same as the "Paese Sera"), is better to abolish waiting for better times: that is another development. (E 'this is the crux of the matter).

As for television I do not want to spend more words that I said about compulsory schooling should be multiplied indefinitely, since it is not a teaching but an "example": "models" that is, through television, are not spoken, but represented. And if the models are they, how can you claim that youth is more exposed and helpless criminaloide or criminal? It 'was the television that has practically (it is only half) ended the era of pity, and began the era of hedonism. It was where young cocky and frustrated with the stupidity and dell'irraggiungibilità all of the models proposed by their school and television, tend to be unstoppable until the delinquency or aggressive or passive to the misery (which is not a crime other than murder).
Now, each opening on the left both the school and the television is not no good: the school and the video is because authoritarian state, and the State is the new production (production of humanity). Thus, if progressives really have to care about the anthropological condition of a people, come together to boldly demand an immediate end to the lessons of compulsory schooling and television broadcasts. It would not be nothing, but would also be much: a little school Quarticciolo without abominable and abandoned its night and its nights, maybe it would help to find its own way of life. Back to what it once was, and earlier than this. Otherwise all that is said on decentralization is foolishly priori or pure bad faith. As for the informative links Quarticciolo - like any other "cultural space" - with the rest of the world, would be sufficient to ensure the wall newspapers and "Unity" and above all the work, which, in this context, naturally assumes a another way, having a good time to unify, and to self-determination, the standard of living with life.

List Cheats On Gpsphone

A MODEST PROPOSAL: REMOVE THE MIDDLE SCHOOL AND TELEVISION

The "modest proposal" by Pier Paolo Pasolini, provocative yes, but so painfully desirable. The swift humor in the service of anthropological mutation of the Italians passed, n el just over half a century, people-to-earth.

Needless to say, only enough, you need to step back and make ten forward, with structured analysis can, quietly, in a collection and air terribly serious break in the deafening noise of the poor language of the banal and repetitive, the vacuous, dell'insensato.

Corriere della Sera , October 18, 1975

Abolish the TV and the school

of Pier Paolo Pasolini

The various cases of crime that the apocalyptically fill the newspapers and our consciousness quite terrified, are not cases : are, of course, extreme cases of a criminal way of being popular and profound mass.
fact the criminals are not only the neo-fascists. Recently an incident (the killing of a girl in the Circeo) has suddenly lightened all consciousness and did pull a big sigh of relief because the perpetrators of the massacre were just fascists of Parioli. So there was to be welcomed for two reasons: 1) to confirm that they are only and always to blame for all fascists, 2) confirmation of the fact that the blame is always only the privileged bourgeois and corrupt. The joy of being confirmed in this ancient populist sentiment - and the moral strength of the annexed configuration - not only has exploded in the Communist newspaper, but in all the press (which, after June 15 has a great fear of being less than just the Communists ). In fact, the bourgeois press was literally happy to blame the criminals of Parioli, because blaming so dramatically, favored them (only the middle-class dramas have real value and interest) and at the same time he could bask in the old idea that the crimes lumpen proletariat, and it is useless to deal with that much more, since it is established that a priori and lumpen proletariat are not criminals.
I think therefore, that the massacre of the Circeo in Italy has stirred up the usual offensive wave of journalistic stupidity. In fact, I repeat, the criminals are not only the neo-fascists, but they are also the same way and with the same consciousness, the proletariat or underclass, who may have voted Communist June 15. Think of the murder of the brothers of Torpignattara Carlino, or aggression of Cinecittà (a boy brutally beaten and locked in the trunk of the car and the girl raped and tortured for seven young of the suburbs of Rome). These criminals "popular" - And for now I am referring, precisely documented, only brothers Carlino - enjoyed the exact same conditional release that the criminals of Parioli, the same impunity that is enjoyed. E 'therefore absurd to accuse the judges who sent out "on bail" if you do not accuse the neo-fascists at the same time and with the same firmness that the courts have sent out "on bail" Carlino brothers (and thousands more of young offenders in the Roman suburbs).

The reality is this: the extreme cases of crime are derived from an environment criminaloide mass. It takes thousands of cases like the little party of Circeo sadistic or brutal aggression for reasons traffic for the realization of cases like those of Parioli or sadistic sadistic Torpingnattara. As for me, I say this for some years that the universe is popular Roman world "odious." I say this with the scandal of right-thinking people, and especially with the scandal of the conformists who do not believe they are. And I also set out the reasons (loss of the young people of their moral values, that is, the particularistic culture, with its patterns of behavior, etc.). And by the way, then, of a universe such as the popular Roman criminaloide must say that there are valid mitigating the usual populist is necessary to have the same rigid puritanical and punitive that we are used to show off against demonstrations criminaloide the extremely bourgeois neo-fascist. In fact, the young Roman lumpen proletariat and petty bourgeois universe is now totally belong: the middle-class model has been successfully imposed their own, once and for all. And their concrete models are the very small middle class idiots and fierce that they, the good times, they despised so much and so wittily as ridiculous and repugnant void. No wonder the girl torturers underclass of Cinecittà, using her as a "thing" by saying, "Take heed that you do what they did to Rosa Lopez." My experience of private, everyday, existential - which opposed the offensive once more abstraction and approximation of journalists and politicians who do not live these things - tells me that there's no real difference in the attitude towards the real and the resulting behavior between the bourgeois Parioli and the underclass of the suburbs. The same enigmatic smile, and livid face shows their moral imponderables (their being suspended between the loss of old values \u200b\u200band the failure to acquire new ones: the total lack of any opinion on his "operation").
Another thing that experience teaches me is that this is a phenomenon totally Italian. It is part of conformism, however outdated, information on Italian comfort themselves with the fact that in other countries have problems of crime: it exists, is true, but arises in a world where the bourgeois institutions remain solid and efficient, and therefore continue to offer in return.
What is it that has transformed the lumpen proletariat and Italian, in substance, petty bourgeois, devoured, most importantly, economic anxiety to be? What is it that has transformed the "masses" of young people in the "masses" of criminaloidi? I've said and repeated dozens of times by now: a "second" industrial revolution in Italy is actually the "first": the cynical consumerism that has destroyed a "real" world, making it a total unreality, where c ' possible choice is between good and evil. Hence the ambiguity that characterizes the criminals and their ferocity, produced by the absolute lack of any traditional inner conflict. There was in their choice between good and evil, but nevertheless there was a choice: the choice dell'impietrimento, the lack of any compassion.

He complains in Italy the lack of a modern police effectiveness against crime. That is, I mostly complain is the lack of an informed conscience of all this, and survival of progressive rhetoric that has nothing to do with reality. Progressives must now be in another world, invent a new way to be free, especially in judging, in fact, he has chosen the end of piety. Admittedly once and for all the failure of tolerance. That was, of course, a false tolerance, and was one of the most important causes degeneration of the masses of young people. Must be short acting, judging, and therefore not a priori (a priori progressive valid until a decade ago).
What are my two modest proposals to tackle crime? There are two proposals swiftiane, as their definition do not care the least humorous to hide.
1) immediately abolish the compulsory school .
2) Abolish immediately television. As teachers and employees of the television can not be eaten, as suggested by Swift, but simply can be put in layoffs.
The compulsory school is a school of initiation into life as a lower middle class: you can teach things useless, silly, false, moralistic, even in the best case (ie when calls to apply the false flattery of democracy ' self-management, decentralization, etc..: a whole mess). In addition, a concept is dynamic only if it includes the expansion and deepening: learning a little 'history makes sense only if it projects into the future the possibility of a real historical culture. Otherwise, the concepts Marche region death, having no future, and thus their function is merely to create, together with a small middle class instead of a proletarian slave or free of an underclass (ie belonging to another culture , which lets you understand where virgin new real things, while it is clear that those who took the compulsory schooling is a prisoner of its lowest circle of knowledge, and be offended in front of each new). A fifth grade good enough today in Italy to a worker and his son. An illusion of progress is that the degradation is a criminal, because it makes: first, presumptuous (because of those two miserable things learned) and second (and often simultaneously), painfully frustrated, because those two things he has learned nothing that earned him the consciousness of his own ignorance. Of course to get to the fifth to eighth class instead, or better, get to the fifteenth class, it would be for me as for everyone, the optimum, I suppose. But today in Italy since compulsory schooling is exactly as I described (and I literally fear the idea that there is added a "sex education", so maybe it means the same as the "Paese Sera"), is better to abolish waiting for better times: that is another development. (E 'this is the crux of the matter).

As for television I do not want to spend more words that I said about compulsory schooling should be multiplied indefinitely, since it is not a teaching but an "example": "models" that is, through television, are not spoken, but represented. And if the models are they, how can you claim that youth is more exposed and helpless criminaloide or criminal? It 'was the television that has practically (it is only half) ended the era of pity, and began the era of hedonism. It was where young cocky and frustrated with the stupidity and dell'irraggiungibilità all of the models proposed by their school and television, tend to be unstoppable until the delinquency or aggressive or passive to the misery (which is not a crime other than murder).
Now, each opening on the left both the school and the television is not no good: the school and the video is because authoritarian state, and the State is the new production (production of humanity). Thus, if progressives really have to care about the anthropological condition of a people, come together to boldly demand an immediate end to the lessons of compulsory schooling and television broadcasts. It would not be nothing, but would also be much: a little school Quarticciolo without abominable and abandoned its night and its nights, maybe it would help to find its own way of life. Back to what it once was, and earlier than this. Otherwise all that is said on decentralization is foolishly priori or pure bad faith. As for the informative links Quarticciolo - like any other "cultural space" - with the rest of the world, would be sufficient to ensure the wall newspapers and "Unity" and above all the work, which, in this context, naturally assumes a another way, having a good time to unify, and to self-determination, the standard of living with life.

Colors That Go Well With Walnut

virgin or young woman? The girl

As from early translations which contain some ambiguity of faith you can build castles and palaces of fraud ...

On 10.3.11 the Republic is an interesting article:

" Two more choices with new translations in step with the times .

So America updates the Bible.
The revised versions have the imprimatur of the Catholic Church and evangelical

As a best-seller remains the uncontested ruler of all time: 415 million copies in America alone, the two most popular versions. Yet each new edition of this book still has the ability to make headlines, turn on the curiosity trigger litigation. It is of course the Bible, of which arrive simultaneously, should be launched on Ash Wednesday, two new translations "updated". There are two versions of the Old Testament that have the imprimatur of the Catholic Church and evangelical: the two editions of far more widespread among faithful in the United States.
The event is a sensation for several decades because neither the one nor the other official translation had been changed (in the case of Catholic since 1970 for the gospel since 1984). But even more, attention is related to the operations "language." The adjustments are made in the name of modernity: to get closer to the spoken language of today, not to lose touch with young people, and so on. But behind these projects 'technical' choices of values \u200b\u200bemerge, possible innovations in interpretation, and that is where the footings for disputes multiply. The New American Bible (Catholic) chose "burnt sacrifice" instead of "holocaust" because this second word has become too weighty historical significance, which obliterates its most ancient origin.
So far no problem, as with other linguistic choices that, in the opinion of the Washington Post, "played at the same time more poetic and more contemporary." You enter a minefield in the translation of the song instead of Isaiah 7: 14, which states that "a young woman," no longer a "virgin" will conceive and have a son. In the name of political correctness, fired a reference to the prophecy about Mary? As the New International Version (Bible of the Protestant evangelical), in place of the "sinful nature" puts "flesh". According to Douglas Moo, chairman of the committee of 15 experts who created the new translation, this "leaves open the question to readers if the sin is a fundamental aspect of our nature, or just one of many external forces to which we are exposed." Where certain passages of the Bible translated in 1984 excluded women from the 'exercise authority "over men in the Church, are now not only by the' take 'power. In the notes it says that "the interpretation is individual to decide whether this refers to all forms of authority over men in the Church, or only to certain contexts." More daring and counter-correction is that the experts introduce gospel in Genesis. in 1984 under the pressure of feminism was not God "The men in his image and likeness," but "human beings" that includes both sexes. Today you return to a version more faithful to the original: "mankind", meaning humanity, but contains the word "man", the masculine. Subtleties, however, that no longer have the political weight of the past: today the average American has available on his mobile phone 50 applications with many different interpretations of the Bible.

...

I highlighted the hottest parts of this article. The second sentence there is little to say. The biblical text speaks of God who created ha'adam which means "Humanity" (the term meant and this already in Ugaritic), and then translated as "human being" instead of "man" is correct. The feminist claim would simply (sic) have to respect the original text.

Compared with the first sentence I thought instead of writing a letter to Republic:

" I read the article on new translations of the Bible and I'm surprised the article when he suggests that the new translation" young woman "instead of" virgin "(Isaiah 7:14) meets the criteria of 'politically correctness', that is some kind of anti-Catholic influences. One does not disappear so far established prophecy about Madonna, as is said, but, more simply, it restores a linguistic truth that Christian had plenty of altered versions; words of Pope Woitjla that the General Audience of January 31, 1996 expressly recognized "the ... word used (almah), in fact, it simply means "a young woman," not necessarily a virgin . In the Old Testament and there is therefore no prophecy about a future virgin mothers are and remain simply young women who have known a man. As nature intended. Not if you take a hurt. "

transcription of 'papal audience are here:

http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/audiences/1996/documents/hf_jp-ii_aud_19960131_it.html

...

In my interview with Mauro Perani, professor of Hebrew at the University of Bologna and the Secretary of the Italian Association for the Study of Judaism, then published on Radical Papers 102, November 2008 (see post "man-woman relationship in Judaism ancient and medieval), I already addressed this very subject:

Question: "... in the Septuagint (the greek translation of the Bible in place between III and the first century BC by the Jews of Alexandria grecofoni) the Hebrew word 'Almah, girl , was made with greek Parthenos, virgin ... "

Perani:" ... at the time this term (Parthenos) technically did not mean "virgin" but "girl, young woman" exactly as in Hebrew. However, after the rise in both the Christian movement and in other Jewish movements, such as revenue, an exaltation of virginity, given condition more suitable to the relationship with God, the Septuagint was reinterpreted as a confirmation of the value of virginity. In this way it was making a cancellation of reality and of female identity, enhanced to the extent that it was de-sexualized to the ideal of a virginal state, line of thought that saw one of his strongest statements in that Jewish group of the followers of Rabbi Yeshua of Nazareth who gave birth to Christianity ... "

The Hebrew Bible refers merely to a young woman who would become a mother. The translation of the Septuagint did not show originally a clear desire to alter the meaning of the passage of Isaiah, where "Almah" and "Parthenos" had roughly the same meaning.

But when Christianity went saying - in an era when Parthenos now had a clear meaning of 'virgin' - and with it came the same arguing the exaltation of virginity, the reinterpretation of the seventies produced a peculiar phenomenon: it was discovered in the Old Testament was not what (the girl) but what we had set (the virgin). What we wanted to see: date since then the certainty of a prophecy about the virginity of the Mother of the Messiah, the prophecy that in fact never existed.

The ambiguity of terms in ancient times may have contributed to building a house of faith. Continued support for centuries the prophecy of the virginity of Mary has also made sense to build (and keep) a house of fraud.

A bit 'is rather more realistic historical criticism when he points to earlier' Virgin Mothers' upstream of the story of Mary, like Isis and Horus the son, for example, or - less known, but perhaps closer all'incipit Christian - the story of Anahita, the Mother of God in the mystery cult of Mithras I speak indirectly even in the post "Persian Girl" in relation to the figure of Daena .

"for his people was the mother figure who feeds him, but the warrior that protects it. The paintings often appears with a golden cloak and a headdress adorned with earrings. In other occasions been described as one who governs weather events (...) It was a minor deity in the ancient religion of Zoroastrianism, but during the Achaemenid empire was identified among the peoples of Syria as a summary of the deities Anat and Asherah. The temple selucide of Kangavar in Iran (c. 200 BC), is dedicated to "Anahita, the Immaculate Virgin Mother of God Mithras. " The terminology of the Christian Virgin Mary is strongly related to this goddess who was both mother and immaculate virgin " (source Wikipedia).

In conclusion, in the Hebrew Bible does not prefigure any Mother and Immaculate Virgin, which is rather feminine image resulting from the cult of Mithras.

Statue of Anahita (from http://digilander.libero.it)

Colors That Go Well With Walnut

virgin or young woman? The girl

As from early translations which contain some ambiguity of faith you can build castles and palaces of fraud ...

On 10.3.11 the Republic is an interesting article:

" Two more choices with new translations in step with the times .

So America updates the Bible.
The revised versions have the imprimatur of the Catholic Church and evangelical

As a best-seller remains the uncontested ruler of all time: 415 million copies in America alone, the two most popular versions. Yet each new edition of this book still has the ability to make headlines, turn on the curiosity trigger litigation. It is of course the Bible, of which arrive simultaneously, should be launched on Ash Wednesday, two new translations "updated". There are two versions of the Old Testament that have the imprimatur of the Catholic Church and evangelical: the two editions of far more widespread among faithful in the United States.
The event is a sensation for several decades because neither the one nor the other official translation had been changed (in the case of Catholic since 1970 for the gospel since 1984). But even more, attention is related to the operations "language." The adjustments are made in the name of modernity: to get closer to the spoken language of today, not to lose touch with young people, and so on. But behind these projects 'technical' choices of values \u200b\u200bemerge, possible innovations in interpretation, and that is where the footings for disputes multiply. The New American Bible (Catholic) chose "burnt sacrifice" instead of "holocaust" because this second word has become too weighty historical significance, which obliterates its most ancient origin.
So far no problem, as with other linguistic choices that, in the opinion of the Washington Post, "played at the same time more poetic and more contemporary." You enter a minefield in the translation of the song instead of Isaiah 7: 14, which states that "a young woman," no longer a "virgin" will conceive and have a son. In the name of political correctness, fired a reference to the prophecy about Mary? As the New International Version (Bible of the Protestant evangelical), in place of the "sinful nature" puts "flesh". According to Douglas Moo, chairman of the committee of 15 experts who created the new translation, this "leaves open the question to readers if the sin is a fundamental aspect of our nature, or just one of many external forces to which we are exposed." Where certain passages of the Bible translated in 1984 excluded women from the 'exercise authority "over men in the Church, are now not only by the' take 'power. In the notes it says that "the interpretation is individual to decide whether this refers to all forms of authority over men in the Church, or only to certain contexts." More daring and counter-correction is that the experts introduce gospel in Genesis. in 1984 under the pressure of feminism was not God "The men in his image and likeness," but "human beings" that includes both sexes. Today you return to a version more faithful to the original: "mankind", meaning humanity, but contains the word "man", the masculine. Subtleties, however, that no longer have the political weight of the past: today the average American has available on his mobile phone 50 applications with many different interpretations of the Bible.

...

I highlighted the hottest parts of this article. The second sentence there is little to say. The biblical text speaks of God who created ha'adam which means "Humanity" (the term meant and this already in Ugaritic), and then translated as "human being" instead of "man" is correct. The feminist claim would simply (sic) have to respect the original text.

Compared with the first sentence I thought instead of writing a letter to Republic:

" I read the article on new translations of the Bible and I'm surprised the article when he suggests that the new translation" young woman "instead of" virgin "(Isaiah 7:14) meets the criteria of 'politically correctness', that is some kind of anti-Catholic influences. One does not disappear so far established prophecy about Madonna, as is said, but, more simply, it restores a linguistic truth that Christian had plenty of altered versions; words of Pope Woitjla that the General Audience of January 31, 1996 expressly recognized "the ... word used (almah), in fact, it simply means "a young woman," not necessarily a virgin . In the Old Testament and there is therefore no prophecy about a future virgin mothers are and remain simply young women who have known a man. As nature intended. Not if you take a hurt. "

transcription of 'papal audience are here:

http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/audiences/1996/documents/hf_jp-ii_aud_19960131_it.html

...

In my interview with Mauro Perani, professor of Hebrew at the University of Bologna and the Secretary of the Italian Association for the Study of Judaism, then published on Radical Papers 102, November 2008 (see post "man-woman relationship in Judaism ancient and medieval), I already addressed this very subject:

Question: "... in the Septuagint (the greek translation of the Bible in place between III and the first century BC by the Jews of Alexandria grecofoni) the Hebrew word 'Almah, girl , was made with greek Parthenos, virgin ... "

Perani:" ... at the time this term (Parthenos) technically did not mean "virgin" but "girl, young woman" exactly as in Hebrew. However, after the rise in both the Christian movement and in other Jewish movements, such as revenue, an exaltation of virginity, given condition more suitable to the relationship with God, the Septuagint was reinterpreted as a confirmation of the value of virginity. In this way it was making a cancellation of reality and of female identity, enhanced to the extent that it was de-sexualized to the ideal of a virginal state, line of thought that saw one of his strongest statements in that Jewish group of the followers of Rabbi Yeshua of Nazareth who gave birth to Christianity ... "

The Hebrew Bible refers merely to a young woman who would become a mother. The translation of the Septuagint did not show originally a clear desire to alter the meaning of the passage of Isaiah, where "Almah" and "Parthenos" had roughly the same meaning.

But when Christianity went saying - in an era when Parthenos now had a clear meaning of 'virgin' - and with it came the same arguing the exaltation of virginity, the reinterpretation of the seventies produced a peculiar phenomenon: it was discovered in the Old Testament was not what (the girl) but what we had set (the virgin). What we wanted to see: date since then the certainty of a prophecy about the virginity of the Mother of the Messiah, the prophecy that in fact never existed.

The ambiguity of terms in ancient times may have contributed to building a house of faith. Continued support for centuries the prophecy of the virginity of Mary has also made sense to build (and keep) a house of fraud.

A bit 'is rather more realistic historical criticism when he points to earlier' Virgin Mothers' upstream of the story of Mary, like Isis and Horus the son, for example, or - less known, but perhaps closer all'incipit Christian - the story of Anahita, the Mother of God in the mystery cult of Mithras I speak indirectly even in the post "Persian Girl" in relation to the figure of Daena .

"for his people was the mother figure who feeds him, but the warrior that protects it. The paintings often appears with a golden cloak and a headdress adorned with earrings. In other occasions been described as one who governs weather events (...) It was a minor deity in the ancient religion of Zoroastrianism, but during the Achaemenid empire was identified among the peoples of Syria as a summary of the deities Anat and Asherah. The temple selucide of Kangavar in Iran (c. 200 BC), is dedicated to "Anahita, the Immaculate Virgin Mother of God Mithras. " The terminology of the Christian Virgin Mary is strongly related to this goddess who was both mother and immaculate virgin " (source Wikipedia).

In conclusion, in the Hebrew Bible does not prefigure any Mother and Immaculate Virgin, which is rather feminine image resulting from the cult of Mithras.

Statue of Anahita (from http://digilander.libero.it)

2 Yr Old Mottled Skin

YARD MACHINE SAFETY

MACHINE SAFETY: RESPONSIBILITY FOR 'THE PRODUCER
The delegation of functions under Article 16 of Legislative Decree no. N.81/2008 is limited to the implementation standards of hygiene and prevention within the company, but it does not operate in relation to products sold outside. The employer, in its capacity as "employer" can not move on the part of the other responsibilities that he has against third parties other than employees (in this If the purchaser to use products with no security requirements), as it would through negotiations to avoid the warranty obligations arising under Article 40 of the Criminal Code and thus undermine the principle of compulsory nature of the penal precept.

Adapted from Environment & Sicurezza.IlSole24Ore "n 3 of 22 February 2011

2 Yr Old Mottled Skin

YARD MACHINE SAFETY

MACHINE SAFETY: RESPONSIBILITY FOR 'THE PRODUCER
The delegation of functions under Article 16 of Legislative Decree no. N.81/2008 is limited to the implementation standards of hygiene and prevention within the company, but it does not operate in relation to products sold outside. The employer, in its capacity as "employer" can not move on the part of the other responsibilities that he has against third parties other than employees (in this If the purchaser to use products with no security requirements), as it would through negotiations to avoid the warranty obligations arising under Article 40 of the Criminal Code and thus undermine the principle of compulsory nature of the penal precept.

Adapted from Environment & Sicurezza.IlSole24Ore "n 3 of 22 February 2011

Why Do Pregnancy Symptoms Disappear

DVD "Occupational Medicine Today: New Frontiers" and "Acts of Congress" of the 73rd Congress MLIS

Please note that you can book the DVD" Occupational Medicine Today: New Frontiers "published on the occasion of the 73rd National Congress Simla
by the Scientific Secretariat and published by Universe Publishing Company.

It also announced that sales in the "Proceedings of Congress" of the 73rd Congress SIMLII.Il DVD and Acts can also be booked in a single formula.

For information and / or reserve the purchase of the DVD and / or 'purchase of the Acts or
http://www.seuroma.com amministrazione@seu-roma.com