of Pier Paolo Pasolini
The various cases of crime that the apocalyptically fill the newspapers and our consciousness quite terrified, are not cases : are, of course, extreme cases of a criminal way of being popular and profound mass.
fact the criminals are not only the neo-fascists. Recently an incident (the killing of a girl in the Circeo) has suddenly lightened all consciousness and did pull a big sigh of relief because the perpetrators of the massacre were just fascists of Parioli. So there was to be welcomed for two reasons: 1) to confirm that they are only and always to blame for all fascists, 2) confirmation of the fact that the blame is always only the privileged bourgeois and corrupt. The joy of being confirmed in this ancient populist sentiment - and the moral strength of the annexed configuration - not only has exploded in the Communist newspaper, but in all the press (which, after June 15 has a great fear of being less than just the Communists ). In fact, the bourgeois press was literally happy to blame the criminals of Parioli, because blaming so dramatically, favored them (only the middle-class dramas have real value and interest) and at the same time he could bask in the old idea that the crimes lumpen proletariat, and it is useless to deal with that much more, since it is established that a priori and lumpen proletariat are not criminals.
I think therefore, that the massacre of the Circeo in Italy has stirred up the usual offensive wave of journalistic stupidity. In fact, I repeat, the criminals are not only the neo-fascists, but they are also the same way and with the same consciousness, the proletariat or underclass, who may have voted Communist June 15. Think of the murder of the brothers of Torpignattara Carlino, or aggression of Cinecittà (a boy brutally beaten and locked in the trunk of the car and the girl raped and tortured for seven young of the suburbs of Rome). These criminals "popular" - And for now I am referring, precisely documented, only brothers Carlino - enjoyed the exact same conditional release that the criminals of Parioli, the same impunity that is enjoyed. E 'therefore absurd to accuse the judges who sent out "on bail" if you do not accuse the neo-fascists at the same time and with the same firmness that the courts have sent out "on bail" Carlino brothers (and thousands more of young offenders in the Roman suburbs).
The reality is this: the extreme cases of crime are derived from an environment criminaloide mass. It takes thousands of cases like the little party of Circeo sadistic or brutal aggression for reasons traffic for the realization of cases like those of Parioli or sadistic sadistic Torpingnattara. As for me, I say this for some years that the universe is popular Roman world "odious." I say this with the scandal of right-thinking people, and especially with the scandal of the conformists who do not believe they are. And I also set out the reasons (loss of the young people of their moral values, that is, the particularistic culture, with its patterns of behavior, etc.). And by the way, then, of a universe such as the popular Roman criminaloide must say that there are valid mitigating the usual populist is necessary to have the same rigid puritanical and punitive that we are used to show off against demonstrations criminaloide the extremely bourgeois neo-fascist. In fact, the young Roman lumpen proletariat and petty bourgeois universe is now totally belong: the middle-class model has been successfully imposed their own, once and for all. And their concrete models are the very small middle class idiots and fierce that they, the good times, they despised so much and so wittily as ridiculous and repugnant void. No wonder the girl torturers underclass of Cinecittà, using her as a "thing" by saying, "Take heed that you do what they did to Rosa Lopez." My experience of private, everyday, existential - which opposed the offensive once more abstraction and approximation of journalists and politicians who do not live these things - tells me that there's no real difference in the attitude towards the real and the resulting behavior between the bourgeois Parioli and the underclass of the suburbs. The same enigmatic smile, and livid face shows their moral imponderables (their being suspended between the loss of old values \u200b\u200band the failure to acquire new ones: the total lack of any opinion on his "operation").
Another thing that experience teaches me is that this is a phenomenon totally Italian. It is part of conformism, however outdated, information on Italian comfort themselves with the fact that in other countries have problems of crime: it exists, is true, but arises in a world where the bourgeois institutions remain solid and efficient, and therefore continue to offer in return.
What is it that has transformed the lumpen proletariat and Italian, in substance, petty bourgeois, devoured, most importantly, economic anxiety to be? What is it that has transformed the "masses" of young people in the "masses" of criminaloidi? I've said and repeated dozens of times by now: a "second" industrial revolution in Italy is actually the "first": the cynical consumerism that has destroyed a "real" world, making it a total unreality, where c ' possible choice is between good and evil. Hence the ambiguity that characterizes the criminals and their ferocity, produced by the absolute lack of any traditional inner conflict. There was in their choice between good and evil, but nevertheless there was a choice: the choice dell'impietrimento, the lack of any compassion.
He complains in Italy the lack of a modern police effectiveness against crime. That is, I mostly complain is the lack of an informed conscience of all this, and survival of progressive rhetoric that has nothing to do with reality. Progressives must now be in another world, invent a new way to be free, especially in judging, in fact, he has chosen the end of piety. Admittedly once and for all the failure of tolerance. That was, of course, a false tolerance, and was one of the most important causes degeneration of the masses of young people. Must be short acting, judging, and therefore not a priori (a priori progressive valid until a decade ago).
What are my two modest proposals to tackle crime? There are two proposals swiftiane, as their definition do not care the least humorous to hide.
1) immediately abolish the compulsory school .
2) Abolish immediately television. As teachers and employees of the television can not be eaten, as suggested by Swift, but simply can be put in layoffs.
The compulsory school is a school of initiation into life as a lower middle class: you can teach things useless, silly, false, moralistic, even in the best case (ie when calls to apply the false flattery of democracy ' self-management, decentralization, etc..: a whole mess). In addition, a concept is dynamic only if it includes the expansion and deepening: learning a little 'history makes sense only if it projects into the future the possibility of a real historical culture. Otherwise, the concepts Marche region death, having no future, and thus their function is merely to create, together with a small middle class instead of a proletarian slave or free of an underclass (ie belonging to another culture , which lets you understand where virgin new real things, while it is clear that those who took the compulsory schooling is a prisoner of its lowest circle of knowledge, and be offended in front of each new). A fifth grade good enough today in Italy to a worker and his son. An illusion of progress is that the degradation is a criminal, because it makes: first, presumptuous (because of those two miserable things learned) and second (and often simultaneously), painfully frustrated, because those two things he has learned nothing that earned him the consciousness of his own ignorance. Of course to get to the fifth to eighth class instead, or better, get to the fifteenth class, it would be for me as for everyone, the optimum, I suppose. But today in Italy since compulsory schooling is exactly as I described (and I literally fear the idea that there is added a "sex education", so maybe it means the same as the "Paese Sera"), is better to abolish waiting for better times: that is another development. (E 'this is the crux of the matter).
As for television I do not want to spend more words that I said about compulsory schooling should be multiplied indefinitely, since it is not a teaching but an "example": "models" that is, through television, are not spoken, but represented. And if the models are they, how can you claim that youth is more exposed and helpless criminaloide or criminal? It 'was the television that has practically (it is only half) ended the era of pity, and began the era of hedonism. It was where young cocky and frustrated with the stupidity and dell'irraggiungibilità all of the models proposed by their school and television, tend to be unstoppable until the delinquency or aggressive or passive to the misery (which is not a crime other than murder).
Now, each opening on the left both the school and the television is not no good: the school and the video is because authoritarian state, and the State is the new production (production of humanity). Thus, if progressives really have to care about the anthropological condition of a people, come together to boldly demand an immediate end to the lessons of compulsory schooling and television broadcasts. It would not be nothing, but would also be much: a little school Quarticciolo without abominable and abandoned its night and its nights, maybe it would help to find its own way of life. Back to what it once was, and earlier than this. Otherwise all that is said on decentralization is foolishly priori or pure bad faith. As for the informative links Quarticciolo - like any other "cultural space" - with the rest of the world, would be sufficient to ensure the wall newspapers and "Unity" and above all the work, which, in this context, naturally assumes a another way, having a good time to unify, and to self-determination, the standard of living with life.
0 comments:
Post a Comment